Before I attempted to write about this graphic (found, as always, on an Internet atheism community), I went to Dictionary.com, to look up the meaning of “evidence”:
1. That which tends to prove or disprove something; ground for belief; proof.
2. Something that makes plain or clear; an indication or sign: “His flushed look was visible evidence of his fever.”
3. Data presented to a court or jury in proof of the facts in issue and which may include the testimony of witnesses, records, documents, or objects.
Based on that, please consider these facts:
The Earth: How did it come to be that this planet we live in is so perfectly attuned to support life – and not just one species of life, but millions? Even the size of this planet and its distance from the sun are just right to make our existence possible. Who did this? Elvis? Justin Bieber?
The universe: our solar system and who knows how many thousands of others. Our galaxy and innumerable other galaxies. Black holes, stars, comets, etc., etc. Has even a genius like Stephen Hawking told us who created it all?
“Through my scientific work, I have come to believe more and more strongly that the physical universe is put together with an ingenuity so astonishing that I cannot accept it merely as a brute fact,” wrote former University of Adelaide theoretical physics professor Paul Davis in his book The Mind of God.
Our consciousness: In The Case for a Creator, former journalist Lee Strobel interviewed many scientific minds and noted “many scientists are concluding that the laws of chemistry and physics cannot explain our experience of consciousness”.
Indeed, Strobel quotes philosopher Michael Ruse who conceded “no one, certainly not [believers in Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution] seems to have any answer” to the question of the origin of human consciousness. Hmm…it’s starting to look like God did it.
Beyond these questions, I showed the graphic that sparked this essay to a wise pastor. Here’s a little of what Ross Carkner had to say:
“The twin towers of New York City’s World Trade Center were made of tons of concrete and miles of steel, the best that we are able to build. Thousands of people depended on those buildings every day. They trusted their lives in the strength of the towers; but it was insufficient.
“Even the tried, tested and true in the physical world — the very things that we live in, work in, travel in are all quite capable of letting us down. Can I then say I do not believe in buildings???”
Then there’s the question of personal experience. Ross writes:
“My experience [of God] may not be evidence enough for you, but then again it might. [In fact,] my experience is considered acceptable evidence in court — it forms my witness while on the stand.”
So an atheist like Dan Barker may not have any evidence for the existence of God, but Ross Carkner does in his own life story. That evidence is credible enough to be used in court trials.
If you wonder whether there’s a God, is that fact credible enough to make a difference to you? What about our Earth, the universe and YOUR consciousness? Post your thoughts below and let’s have a conversation.
Frank's Cottage 
I agree with your thoughts, Frank. With a legal view look at what constitutes evidence and an honest and open look at the cosmological, biological, experiential and Judeo-Christian source documents veracity, there is overwhelming evidence for the existence of a Creator who can be called “God” and who carries the nature and qualities that are consistent with the Judeo-Christian portrayal. Thanks for the post!
Thanks for reading and commenting, Harold. I appreciate it. 🙂
Eyewitness testimony is the least convincing, least reliable and least desirable type of evidence that is utilized in a court room. Forensic evidence carries the day when the two are in dispute.
You may be impressed that the environment we live in allows us to live, but it is difficult to imagine how we could have this exchange otherwise, regardless of causation. Its mere existence is anything but pointing to a specific causation.
Most scientists do hold that chemistry and physics are full explanations for the workings of our brains. How is non-scientist Lee’s anecdotal conversation to be considered actual evidence to the contrary?
Thanks for your comment. Evidence is still evidence; just because it’s not forensic does NOT mean it’s useless. It still counts. I’m happy to agree to disagree about the source of the environment we live in. 🙂
So, basically… personal experience is the evidence you present? Something that, by definition, can’t be shared with someone else. If so, I guess I can never know if God is real or not.
That’s not correct. I’ve said in another blog how the Christian faith is a mix of reason, understanding and faith. I suggest you read more blogs to see how that works.
In thinking about this question , I have often thought that science is good at explaining how, when, where, what of the universe, but cannot explain the all important why. If there is no God, then why is there a universe? Why did at some point the same simple atoms that make up the rocks, water and gases of this universe make the incredible transformation to being “alive”? Why did they become determined to stay “alive” and perpetuate this condition?
One would think they must see an advantage to being “alive”, or why bother? What is the point of it all? As far as I can tell , science has no answers to these questions, whereas religion, at least in the Judeo-Christian bible, gives us some answers. Perhaps this answer is not proof of God, but at least for me provides the logic for belief.